Type F Reorganizations: General Overview and Their Use in the Context of an Up-C Structure

Founders of new companies often give little thought to long-term entity structure beyond choosing a convenient form and state of incorporation. Early on, practical needs (like registering in the home state and starting operations) tend to outweigh nuanced legal and tax considerations. However, as a business grows and evolves, its owners may find compelling reasons to change the company’s form or jurisdiction. These reasons include optimizing tax rates, adjusting to a new business direction, preparing for an acquisition or public offering, or accommodating investor demands such as those tied to employee equity agreements. When a corporation needs to convert into a different type of entity or re-domicile in another state, careful planning is essential to avoid unintended tax consequences. One powerful tool for achieving such changes in a tax-efficient manner is the Type F reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).

This article provides a comprehensive overview of Type F reorganizations, explores their technical operation under federal tax law, and discusses unique advantages that make them attractive in transactions—including their role in Up-C structures. We also highlight practical implementation considerations (such as state corporate law and dissenting shareholder issues) and other use cases beyond the Up-C context. The goal is to offer legal professionals, including executive compensation lawyers in Austin, and sophisticated clients a rigorous understanding of how Type F reorganizations work and why they are a favored mechanism in sophisticated corporate restructurings.

IRC § 368(a)(1)(F) defines a Type F reorganization as “a mere change in identity, form, or place of organization of one corporation, however effected.” In substance, an F reorganization is the simplest form of tax-free reorganization: it contemplates one continuing corporate enterprise that, despite undergoing some change in its legal identity or structure, is treated for tax purposes as the same corporation as before.

Classic examples include reincorporating a company in a new state or converting a corporation into a new entity form without introducing new shareholders or assets. The IRS and Treasury intended flexibility with the phrase “however effected,” allowing a Type F reorg to be accomplished through any series of steps, provided certain conditions are met.

From a tax perspective, a qualifying Type F reorganization is generally tax-free for both the corporation and its shareholders. The resulting entity is treated as if it were the original corporation by operation of law. Items such as earnings and profits, accumulated losses, and accounting methods carry over to the new entity. Under IRC § 381, the surviving corporation succeeds to the tax attributes of the predecessor and is treated as the same taxpayer. In short, a well-executed F reorganization results in no gain or loss recognized on the change and preserves the corporation’s tax history intact.

Despite the broad statutory language of a “mere change… however effected,” not every transaction qualifies. Treasury Regulations (Treas. Reg. § 1.368-2(m)) outline six precise requirements:

1. Distribution of New Stock for Old Stock: All stock of the resulting corporation must be distributed in exchange for the stock of the original corporation. Shareholders must receive only stock in the new company.
2. Identity of Stock Ownership: The same persons must own all stock in both the original and resulting corporation in identical proportions. Any shift in ownership—such as introducing a new investor—disqualifies the transaction.
3. No Prior Assets or Attributes in New Corporation: The new corporation must not have significant assets or tax attributes prior to the reorganization, aside from de minimis amounts.
4. Complete Liquidation of the Original Corporation: The original corporation must transfer all assets to the new corporation and cease to exist for federal income tax purposes.
5. Only One Acquiring Corporation: Only the resulting corporation can hold the original corporation’s assets. Splitting assets across multiple entities invalidates the F reorg.
6. Only One Predecessor Corporation: The resulting corporation must not receive assets from more than one original corporation.

These requirements ensure continuity and prevent misuse of the Type F structure for purposes other than a genuine internal reorganization.

When structured correctly, a Type F reorganization qualifies as tax-deferred under IRC §§ 354, 361, and 368. The corporation is treated as the same taxpayer before and after. Tax attributes carry forward under IRC § 381, including net operating losses (NOLs), earnings and profits, capital losses, tax credit carryovers, and accounting methods.

Unlike other reorgs, a Type F does not interrupt the tax year. It also allows for loss carrybacks in some circumstances. The IRS does not require continuity of business enterprise or interest, although a valid business purpose must exist.

F reorganizations are especially valuable in preserving S corporation status and enabling flexible planning around bonus structure legal guidance or reorganizations tied to executive compensation.

• Simplicity and Flexibility: Type F reorganizations involve only a single entity continuing in a new form or jurisdiction, making them straightforward to implement.
• Preservation of Tax Attributes: Unlike asset transfers or non-F reorganizations, F reorganizations preserve all tax attributes.
• Facilitating Asset Step-Up in Acquisitions: Sellers receive stock-sale treatment (capital gains), while buyers get asset purchase treatment (basis step-up).
• Retention of EIN and Contracts: Regulatory and commercial continuity is preserved, simplifying ongoing operations.
• Fewer Pitfalls: Type F reorganizations have fewer structural requirements than A, B, C, or D reorganizations.

Option 1: Direct Merger or Conversion

A company can reincorporate in another state (e.g., Texas to Delaware) or change its form (e.g., corporation to LLC) through state law mechanisms. If properly structured, such transactions qualify as Type F reorganizations.

Option 2: Holding Company Formation

This involves shareholders exchanging their stock for shares in a new holding company (HoldCo), and the original corporation becoming a subsidiary of HoldCo. This approach is helpful when unanimous shareholder consent is unavailable.

Care must be taken in the sequencing of steps, especially if shareholder buyouts or new investments are involved. IRS guidance allows for some flexibility as long as the F reorganization is not tainted by outside transactions.

Handling dissenting shareholders may involve drag-along rights or judicial appraisal rights under state law. Early communication and legal counsel are essential, especially when structuring bonus plans or transitioning into new equity frameworks.

Type F reorganizations are often used in Up-C IPO structures, allowing a corporation to convert into a pass-through entity structure without immediate tax consequences. This is especially useful for S corporations transitioning to public markets.

By creating a new parent company (PubCo) and converting the existing entity into a disregarded subsidiary, businesses can form an LLC partnership with PubCo and legacy owners as members. The structure enables continued flow-through taxation for original owners, with step-ups in basis as investors exchange units for PubCo shares.

Beyond Up-C uses, Type F reorganizations are valuable in private equity deals, especially when a buyer seeks an asset purchase treatment and sellers prefer capital gains treatment on stock sales. They are also helpful in remedying S-election issues and internal corporate restructurings related to executive planning.

A Type F reorganization, while described as a “mere change,” provides powerful strategic advantages when properly executed. It enables corporations to change form or jurisdiction, implement complex deal structures, or prepare for IPOs—all while preserving tax attributes and avoiding current tax recognition.

For legal teams managing sophisticated transactions, particularly those involving employee equity agreements or bonus structure legal guidance, Type F reorganizations offer an invaluable tool. With careful planning and input from executive compensation lawyers in Austin and tax professionals, businesses can use this mechanism to transition smoothly into their next phase of growth.

Back